← All templates

Template preview · Starter

Side Project Before Winter

Ship a small thing before winter turns it into a thought experiment.

A constrained project brief for choosing a useful scope, testing it, and finishing.

Structure
4 sections
Criteria
12
Sources
8
Watches
5
Default approach
Review first
See the sample

Set the purpose first. Then change every section, criterion, and agent setting before anything runs.

Fictional sample

Structure and criteria

Sample content shows the shape of a useful document. Copying it is optional.

  1. 01

    Project bet

    Name the audience, problem, and smallest credible outcome.

    Review first

    Criteria

    • Names a specific audience and the problem they have today, in their words
    • States the deliverable and an observable definition of done
    • Gives a hypothesis with the behaviour that would prove it worth continuing

    Sources

    Watches

    • Searches “audience problem frustrated OR workaround” monthly
    • Follows Scope and risks
  2. 02

    Scope and risks

    Protect the finish line by making trade-offs visible.

    Review first

    Criteria

    • Lists at least three exclusions with a reason each
    • Names the highest-impact risk and a test to run before a fifth of the work is done
    • Writes each risk test with a pass condition, such as importing 1,000 rows in under two minutes by a date

    Sources

  3. 03

    Shipping plan

    Move from first task to public release in visible steps.

    Review first

    Criteria

    • Has four to six dated milestones from now to ship date
    • Ends with a real release to a named audience, not "polish"
    • Puts a go or no-go checkpoint 70 to 80 percent through, driven by user feedback and risk tests

    Sources

    • Indie Hackers indiehackers.comHow other makers timed building, testing and launch.
    • Timeline estimator (fictional) api.timeline-estimator.example.comFictional comparison of a milestone plan with typical side-project timelines.

    Watches

    • Follows Scope and risks
    • Follows User signals
  4. 04

    User signals

    Gather evidence that the project is useful enough to continue.

    Review first

    Criteria

    • Logs at least two signals, each with a source and date
    • Keeps observation ("three users asked for CSV export") apart from interpretation
    • Sets a stop or pivot trigger, such as zero completions in the first week

    Sources

    Watches

    • Searches “project name feedback OR "feature request"” weekly